IEEE 802.11 Medium Access Control (MAC) Profile for Control and Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP)
draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac-08
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 7494.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Chunju Shao , DENG Hui , Rajesh Pazhyannur , Farooq Bari , Rong Zhang , Satoru Matsushima | ||
| Last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2014-12-18) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
| Document shepherd | Warren "Ace" Kumari | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2014-08-12 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 7494 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Benoît Claise | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | Version Changed - Review Needed | |
| IANA action state | RFC-Ed-Ack |
draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac-08
Network Working Group C. Shao
Internet-Draft H. Deng
Intended status: Standards Track China Mobile
Expires: June 21, 2015 R. Pazhyannur
Cisco Systems
F. Bari
AT&T
R. Zhang
China Telecom
S. Matsushima
SoftBank Telecom
December 18, 2014
IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile for CAPWAP
draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-hybridmac-08
Abstract
The CAPWAP protocol binding for IEEE 802.11 defines two MAC (Medium
Access Control) modes for IEEE 802.11 WTP (Wireless Transmission
Point): Split and Local MAC. In the Split MAC mode, the partitioning
of encryption/decryption functions are not clearly defined. In the
Split MAC mode description, IEEE 802.11 encryption is specified as
located in either the AC (Access Controller) or the WTP, with no
clear way for the AC to inform the WTP of where the encryption
functionality should be located. This leads to interoperability
issues, especially when the AC and WTP come from different vendors.
To prevent interoperability issues, this specification defines an
IEEE 802.11 MAC profile message element in which each profile
specifies an unambiguous division of encryption functionality between
the WTP and AC.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
Shao, et al. Expires June 21, 2015 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft CAPWAP MAC Profile December 2014
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 21, 2015.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. IEEE MAC Profile Descriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Split MAC with WTP encryption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Split MAC with AC encryption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3. IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile Frame Exchange . . . . . . . . . 6
3. MAC Profile Message Element Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1. IEEE 802.11 Supported MAC Profiles . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.2. IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
8. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1. Introduction
The CAPWAP protocol supports two MAC modes of operation: Split and
Local MAC, as described in [RFC5415], [RFC5416]. However, there are
MAC functions that have not been clearly defined. For example IEEE
802.11 encryption is specified as located in either in the AC or the
WTP with no clear way to negotiate where it should be located.
Because different vendors have different definitions of the MAC mode,
many MAC layer functions are mapped differently to either the WTP or
the AC by different vendors. Therefore, depending upon the vendor,
the operators in their deployments have to perform different
configurations based on implementation of the two modes by their
vendor. If there is no clear specification, then operators will
Shao, et al. Expires June 21, 2015 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft CAPWAP MAC Profile December 2014
experience interoperability issues with WTPs and ACs from different
vendors.
Figure 1 from [RFC5416], illustrates how some functions are processed
in different places in the Local MAC and Split MAC mode.
Specifically, note that in the Split MAC mode the IEEE 802.11
encryption/decryption is specified as WTP/AC implying that it could
be at either location. This is not an issue with Local MAC because
encryption is always at the WTP.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Functions | Local MAC | Split MAC |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Distribution Service | WTP/AC | AC |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Integration Service | WTP | AC |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Beacon Generation | WTP | WTP |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Probe Response Generation| WTP | WTP |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Function |Power Mgmt | WTP | WTP |
+ |/Packet Buffering | | |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Fragmentation | WTP | WTP/AC |
+ |/Defragmentation | | |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Assoc/Disassoc/Reassoc | WTP/AC | AC |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Classifying | WTP | AC |
+ IEEE +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 802.11 QoS |Scheduling | WTP | WTP/AC |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Queuing | WTP | WTP |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |IEEE 802.1X/EAP | AC | AC |
+ IEEE +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 802.11 RSN |RSNA Key Management | AC | AC |
+ (WPA2) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |IEEE 802.11 | WTP | WTP/AC |
+ |Encryption/Decryption | | |
|-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: Functions in Local MAC and Split MAC
Shao, et al. Expires June 21, 2015 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft CAPWAP MAC Profile December 2014
To solve this problem, this specification introduces IEEE 802.11 MAC
profile. The MAC profile unambiguously specifies where the various
MAC functionality should be located.
2. IEEE MAC Profile Descriptions
A IEEE MAC Profile refers to a description of how the MAC
functionality is split between the WTP and AC shown in Figure 1.
2.1. Split MAC with WTP encryption
The functional split for the Split MAC with WTP encryption is
provided in Figure 2. This profile is similar to the Split MAC
description in [RFC5416], except that IEEE 802.11 encryption/
decryption is at the WTP. Note that fragmentation is always done at
the same entity as the encryption. Consequently, in this profile
fragmentation/defragmentation is also done only at the WTP. Note
that scheduling functionality is denoted as WTP/AC. As explained in
[RFC5416], this means that the admission control component of IEEE
802.11 resides on the AC, the real-time scheduling and queuing
functions are on the WTP.
Shao, et al. Expires June 21, 2015 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft CAPWAP MAC Profile December 2014
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Functions | Profile |
| | 0 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Distribution Service | AC |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Integration Service | AC |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Beacon Generation | WTP |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Probe Response Generation| WTP |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Function |Power Mgmt | WTP |
+ |/Packet Buffering | |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Fragmentation | WTP |
+ |/Defragmentation | |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Assoc/Disassoc/Reassoc | AC |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Classifying | AC |
+ IEEE +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 802.11 QoS |Scheduling | WTP/AC |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Queuing | WTP |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |IEEE 802.1X/EAP | AC |
+ IEEE +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 802.11 RSN |RSNA Key Management | AC |
+ (WPA2) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |IEEE 802.11 | WTP |
+ |Encryption/Decryption | |
|-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: Functions in Split MAC with WTP Encryption
2.2. Split MAC with AC encryption
The functional split for the Split MAC with AC encryption is provided
in Figure 3. This profile is similar to the Split MAC in [RFC5416]
except that IEEE 802.11 encryption/decryption is at the AC. Since
fragmentation is always done at the same entity as the encryption, in
this profile, AC does fragmentation/defragmentation.
Shao, et al. Expires June 21, 2015 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft CAPWAP MAC Profile December 2014
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Functions | Profile |
| | 1 |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Distribution Service | AC |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Integration Service | AC |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Beacon Generation | WTP |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Probe Response Generation| WTP |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Function |Power Mgmt | WTP |
+ |/Packet Buffering | |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Fragmentation | AC |
+ |/Defragmentation | |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Assoc/Disassoc/Reassoc | AC |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Classifying | AC |
+ IEEE +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 802.11 QoS |Scheduling | WTP |
+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |Queuing | WTP |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |IEEE 802.1X/EAP | AC |
+ IEEE +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| 802.11 RSN |RSNA Key Management | AC |
+ (WPA2) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |IEEE 802.11 | AC |
+ |Encryption/Decryption | |
|-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 3: Functions in Split MAC with AC encryption
2.3. IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile Frame Exchange
An example of message exchange using the IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile
message element is shown in Figure 4. The WTP informs the AC of the
various MAC profiles it supports. This happens either in a Discovery
Request message or the Join Request message. The AC determines the
appropriate profile and configures the WTP with the profile while
configuring the WLAN.
Shao, et al. Expires June 21, 2015 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft CAPWAP MAC Profile December 2014
+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+
| WTP | | AC |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+
|Join Request[Supported IEEE 802.11 |
| MAC Profiles ] |
|---------------------------------------->|
| |
|Join Response |
|<----------------------------------------|
| |
|IEEE 802.11 WLAN Config. Request [ |
| IEEE 802.11 Add WLAN, |
| IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile |
| ] |
|<----------------------------------------|
| |
|IEEE 802.11 WLAN Config. Response |
|---------------------------------------->|
Figure 4: Message Exchange For Negotiating MAC Profile
3. MAC Profile Message Element Definitions
3.1. IEEE 802.11 Supported MAC Profiles
The IEEE 802.11 Supported MAC Profile message element allows the WTP
to communicate the profiles it supports. The Discovery Request
message, Primary Discovery Request message, and Join Request message
may include one such message element.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0
+=+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
| Num_Profiles | Profile_1 | Profile_[2..N]..
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
Figure 5: IEEE 802.11 Supported MAC Profiles
o Type: TBD for IEEE 802.11 Supported MAC Profiles
o Num_Profiles >=1: This refers to number of profiles present in
this message element. There must be at least one profile.
o Profile: Each profile is identified by a value specified in
Section 3.2.
Shao, et al. Expires June 21, 2015 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft CAPWAP MAC Profile December 2014
3.2. IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile
The IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile message element allows the AC to select a
profile. This message element may be provided along with the IEEE
802.11 ADD WLAN message element while configuring a WLAN on the WTP.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+=+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Profile |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 6: IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile
o Type: TBD for IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile
o Profile: The profile is identified by a value as given below
* 0: This refers to the Split MAC Profile with WTP encryption
* 1: This refers to the Split MAC Profile with AC encryption
4. Security Considerations
This document does not introduce any new security risks compared to
[RFC5416]. The negotiation messages between the WTP and AC have
origin authentication and data integrity. As a result an attacker
cannot interfere with the messages to force a less secure mode
choice. The security considerations described in [RFC5416] apply
here as well.
5. IANA Considerations
This document requires the following IANA actions:
o This specification defines two new message elements, IEEE 802.11
Supported MAC Profiles (described in Section 3.1) and IEEE 802.11
MAC Profile (described in Section 3.2). These elements needs to
be registered in the existing CAPWAP Message Element Type
registry, defined in [RFC5415]. The values for these elements
needs to be between 1024 and 2047 (see Section 15.7 in [RFC5415]).
CAPWAP Protocol Message Element Type Value
IEEE 802.11 Supported MAC Profiles TBD1
IEEE 802.11 MAC Profile TBD2
o The IEEE 802.11 Supported MAC Profiles message element and IEEE
802.11 MAC Profile message element include a Profile Field (as
defined in Section 3.2). The Profile field in the IEEE 802.11
Supported MAC Profiles denotes the MAC profiles supported by the
WTP. The profile field in the IEEE MAC profile denotes MAC
Shao, et al. Expires June 21, 2015 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft CAPWAP MAC Profile December 2014
profile assigned to the WTP. The namespace for the field is 8
bits (0-255). This specification defines two values, zero (0) and
one (1) as described below. The remaining values (2-255) are
controlled and maintained by IANA and require an Expert Review.
IANA needs to create a new sub-registry called IEEE 802.11 Split
MAC Profile and add the new sub-registry to the existing registry
"Control And Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP)
Parameters". The registry format is given below.
Profile Type Value Reference
Split MAC with WTP encryption 0
Split MAC with AC encryption 1
6. Contributors
Yifan Chen chenyifan@chinamobile.com
Naibao Zhou zhounaibao@chinamobile.com
7. Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for extremely valuable suggestions from
Dorothy Stanley in developing this specification.
Guidance from management team: Melinda Shore, Scott Bradner, Chris
Liljenstolpe, Benoit Claise, Joel Jaeggli, Dan Romascanu are highly
appreciated.
8. Normative References
[RFC5415] Calhoun, P., Montemurro, M., and D. Stanley, "Control And
Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) Protocol
Specification", RFC 5415, March 2009.
[RFC5416] Calhoun, P., Montemurro, M., and D. Stanley, "Control and
Provisioning of Wireless Access Points (CAPWAP) Protocol
Binding for IEEE 802.11", RFC 5416, March 2009.
Authors' Addresses
Chunju Shao
China Mobile
No.32 Xuanwumen West Street
Beijing 100053
China
Email: shaochunju@chinamobile.com
Shao, et al. Expires June 21, 2015 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft CAPWAP MAC Profile December 2014
Hui Deng
China Mobile
No.32 Xuanwumen West Street
Beijing 100053
China
Email: denghui@chinamobile.com
Rajesh S. Pazhyannur
Cisco Systems
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134
USA
Email: rpazhyan@cisco.com
Farooq Bari
AT&T
7277 164th Ave NE
Redmond WA 98052
USA
Email: farooq.bari@att.com
Rong Zhang
China Telecom
No.109 Zhongshandadao avenue
Guangzhou 510630
China
Email: zhangr@gsta.com
Satoru Matsushima
SoftBank Telecom
1-9-1 Higashi-Shinbashi, Munato-ku
Tokyo
Japan
Email: satoru.matsushima@g.softbank.co.jp
Shao, et al. Expires June 21, 2015 [Page 10]