(registered 2010-08-26) IMAP keyword name: $NotJunk Purpose (description): The user (or a delivery agent on behalf of the user) may choose to mark a message as definitely not containing junk ($NotJunk; see also the related keyword $Junk). The $NotJunk keyword can be used to mark, group or show messages that the user wants to see. Private or Shared on a server: BOTH (see Note 3) Is it an advisory keyword or may it cause an automatic action: This keyword is advisory. When/by whom the keyword is set/cleared: $NotJunk can be set either by a delivery agent or a mail client on users behalf. The user must be able to set or clear $NonJunk at any time. Related keywords: $Junk Related IMAP capabilities: None Security considerations: A message marked with $NotJunk keyword by one user might not be considered not to be junk by another user (or even by the same user under different circumstances). Any automated action taken by the mail system or by the MUA in response to this keyword needs to take that into account. Published specification (recommended): Person & email address to contact for further information: Alexey Melnikov Intended usage: COMMON Owner/Change controller: IESG Note: 1). $Junk and $NotJunk are mutually exclusive. If more than one of them is set for a message, the mail client MUST treat this as if none of them is set and SHOULD remove both of them from the IMAP server. 2). There are existing clients that use mutually exclusive keywords Junk and NotJunk to mark a message as definitely containing /definitely non containing junk information. Use of "Junk"/"NotJunk" is deprecated, mail clients should be using "$Junk"/"$NotJunk" instead. 3). Because different users might have differing views of what constitutes "junk", server implementations SHOULD favor the use of a private keyword, to allow the most flexibility. However, because it will often be the case that there's broad agreement on the categorization of most messages in this regard, it will make the most sense for systems that implement shared messages to use a shared keyword, and to allow individual users to override that designation for themselves. An implementation might even take multiple overrides as a suggestion to change the shared flag, and consider that a useful optimization.