Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6)
draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-14
The information below is for an old version of the document that is already published as an RFC.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 9514.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Gaurav Dawra , Clarence Filsfils , Ketan Talaulikar , Mach Chen , Daniel Bernier , Bruno Decraene | ||
| Last updated | 2023-12-05 (Latest revision 2023-02-17) | ||
| Replaces | draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | Proposed Standard | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews |
INTDIR Telechat review
(of
-12)
by Timothy Winters
Ready w/nits
|
||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Submitted to IESG for Publication | |
| Document shepherd | Susan Hares | ||
| Shepherd write-up | Show Last changed 2022-10-14 | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Became RFC 9514 (Proposed Standard) | |
| Action Holders |
(None)
|
||
| Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | Alvaro Retana | ||
| Send notices to | shares@ndzh.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com | ||
| IANA | IANA review state | Version Changed - Review Needed | |
| IANA action state | RFC-Ed-Ack |
draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-14
Inter-Domain Routing G. Dawra
Internet-Draft LinkedIn
Intended status: Standards Track C. Filsfils
Expires: 21 August 2023 K. Talaulikar, Ed.
Cisco Systems
M. Chen
Huawei
D. Bernier
Bell Canada
B. Decraene
Orange
17 February 2023
BGP Link State Extensions for SRv6
draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-14
Abstract
Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) allows for a flexible definition of
end-to-end paths within various topologies by encoding paths as
sequences of topological or functional sub-paths, called "segments".
These segments are advertised by various protocols such as BGP, IS-IS
and OSPFv3.
This document defines extensions to BGP Link-state (BGP-LS) to
advertise SRv6 segments along with their behaviors and other
attributes via BGP. The BGP-LS address-family solution for SRv6
described in this document is similar to BGP-LS for SR for the MPLS
data-plane defined in a separate document.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 August 2023.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. SRv6 Node Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. SRv6 Capabilities TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2. SRv6 Node MSD Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4. SRv6 Link Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.1. SRv6 End.X SID TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4.2. SRv6 LAN End.X SID TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.3. SRv6 Link MSD Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5. SRv6 Prefix Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.1. SRv6 Locator TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
6. SRv6 SID NLRI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
6.1. SRv6 SID Information TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
7. SRv6 SID Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
7.1. SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
7.2. SRv6 BGP Peer Node SID TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
8. SRv6 SID Structure TLV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
9.1. BGP-LS NLRI-Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
9.2. BGP-LS TLVs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
9.3. SRv6 BGP EPE SID Flags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
10. Manageability Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
12. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
13. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
14. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
14.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
14.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Appendix A. Differences with BGP-EPE for SR-MPLS . . . . . . . . 24
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
1. Introduction
SRv6 refers to Segment Routing instantiated on the IPv6 data-plane
[RFC8402]. An SRv6 Segment is often referred to by its SRv6 Segment
Identifier (SID).
The network programming paradigm [RFC8986] is central to SRv6. It
describes how different behaviors can be bound to SIDs and how a
network program can be expressed as a combination of SIDs.
An SRv6-capable node maintains all the SRv6 segments explicitly
instantiated locally.
The IS-IS and OSPFv3 link-state routing protocols have been extended
to advertise some of these SRv6 SIDs and SRv6-related information
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions],
[I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]. Other SRv6 SIDs may be
instantiated on a node via other mechanisms for topological or
service functionalities.
The advertisement of SR related information along with the topology
for the MPLS data-plane instantiation (SR-MPLS) is specified in
[RFC9085] and for the BGP Egress Peer Engineering (EPE) is specified
in [RFC9086]. On similar lines, introducing the SRv6 related
information in BGP-LS allows consumer applications that require
topological visibility to also receive the SRv6 SIDs from nodes
across an IGP domain or even across Autonomous Systems (AS), as
required. This allows applications to leverage the SRv6 capabilities
for network programming.
The identifying key of each Link-State object, namely a node, link,
or prefix, is encoded in the Network-Layer Reachability Information
(NLRI) and the properties of the object are encoded in the BGP-LS
Attribute [RFC7752].
This document describes extensions to BGP-LS to advertise the SRv6
SIDs and other SRv6 information from all the SRv6 capable nodes in
the IGP domain when sourced from link-state routing protocols and
directly from individual SRv6 capable nodes (e.g. when sourced from
BGP for EPE).
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
2. BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6
BGP-LS [RFC7752] defines the Node, Link, and Prefix Link-State
Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI) types and the
advertisement of their attributes via BGP.
When a BGP-LS router advertises topology information that it sources
from the underlying link-state routing protocol, then it derives the
corresponding SRv6 information from the SRv6 extensions for IS-IS
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions] or OSPFv3
[I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions], as applicable. In practice,
this derivation comprises a simple copy of the relevant fields from
the IS-IS/OSPFv3 TLV/sub-TLV into the fields of the corresponding
BGP-LS TLV/sub-TLV. When a BGP-LS router advertises topology
information from the BGP routing protocol (e.g., for EPE) or when it
advertises SRv6 SIDs associated with a node using Direct as the
Protocol-ID, then it derives the SRv6 information from the local
node. Such information is advertised only on behalf of the local
router, in contrast to the advertisement of information from all
nodes of an IGP domain when sourced from a link-state routing
protocol.
The SRv6 information pertaining to a node is advertised via the BGP-
LS Node NLRI and using the BGP-LS Attribute TLVs as follows:
* SRv6 Capabilities of the node are advertised via the SRv6
Capabilities TLV (Section 3.1).
* Maximum SID Depth (MSD) types introduced for SRv6 are advertised
(Section 3.2) using the Node MSD TLV specified in [RFC8814]
* Algorithm support for SRv6 is advertised via the SR-Algorithm TLV
specified in [RFC9085].
The SRv6 information pertaining to a link is advertised via the BGP-
LS Link NLRI and using the BGP-LS Attribute TLVs as follows:
* SRv6 SID of the IGP Adjacency SID or the BGP EPE Peer Adjacency
SID [RFC8402] is advertised via the SRv6 End.X SID TLV introduced
in this document (Section 4.1).
* SRv6 SID of the IGP Adjacency SID to a non-Designated Router (DR)
or non-Designated Intermediate-System (DIS) [RFC8402] is
advertised via the SRv6 LAN End.X SID TLV introduced in this
document (Section 4.2).
* MSD types introduced for SRv6 are advertised (Section 4.3) using
the Link MSD TLV specified in [RFC8814].
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
The SRv6 information pertaining to a prefix is advertised via the
BGP-LS Prefix NLRI and using the BGP-LS Attribute TLVs as follows:
* SRv6 Locator is advertised via the SRv6 Locator TLV introduced in
this document (Section 5.1).
* The attributes of the SRv6 Locator are advertised via the Prefix
Attribute Flags TLV specified in [RFC9085].
The SRv6 SIDs associated with the node are advertised using the BGP-
LS SRv6 SID NLRI introduced in this document (Section 6). This
enables the BGP-LS encoding to scale to cover a potentially large set
of SRv6 SIDs instantiated on a node with the granularity of
individual SIDs and without affecting the size and scalability of the
BGP-LS updates. Had the SRv6 SIDs been advertised within the BGP-LS
Link Attribute associated with the existing Node NLRI, the BGP-LS
update would have grown rather large with the increase in SRv6 SIDs
on the node and would have also required a large update message to be
generated for any change to even a single SRv6 SID. BGP-LS Attribute
TLVs for the SRv6 SID NLRI are introduced in this document as
follows:
* The endpoint behavior of the SRv6 SID is advertised via the SRv6
Endpoint Behavior TLV (Section 7.1).
* The BGP EPE Peer Node context for a PeerNode SID, and the Peer Set
context for a PeerSet SID [RFC8402] are advertised via the SRv6
BGP EPE Peer Node SID TLV (Section 7.2),
Subsequent sections of this document specify the encoding and usage
of these extensions. All the TLVs introduced follow the formats and
common field definitions provided in [RFC7752].
3. SRv6 Node Attributes
The SRv6 attributes of a node are advertised using the BGP-LS
Attribute TLVs defined in this section and associated with the BGP-LS
Node NLRI.
3.1. SRv6 Capabilities TLV
This BGP-LS Attribute TLV is used to announce the SRv6 capabilities
of the node along with the BGP-LS Node NLRI and indicates the SRv6
support by the node. A single instance of this TLV MUST be included
in the BGP-LS attribute for each SRv6 capable node. The IS-IS SRv6
Capabilities sub-TLV [I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions] and the
OSPFv3 SRv6 Capabilities TLV [I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]
that map to this BGP-LS TLV are specified with the ability to carry
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
optional sub-sub-TLVs/sub-TLVs. However, no such extensions are
currently defined. Moreover, the SRv6 Capabilities TLV defined below
is not extensible. As a result, it is expected that any extensions
will be introduced as top-level TLVs in the BGP-LS Attribute.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Flags | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: SRv6 Capabilities TLV Format
Where:
* Type: 1038
* Length : 4.
* Flags: 2 octet field. The flags are copied from the IS-IS SRv6
Capabilities sub-TLV (section 2 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions]) or from the OSPFv3 SRv6
Capabilities TLV (section 2 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]) in the case of IS-IS or
OSPFv3 respectively.
* Reserved: 2 octet that MUST be set to 0 when originated and
ignored on receipt.
3.2. SRv6 Node MSD Types
The Node MSD TLV [RFC8814] of the BGP-LS Attribute of the Node NLRI
is also used to advertise the limits and the Segment Routing Header
(SRH) [RFC8754] operations supported by the SRv6 capable node. The
SRv6 MSD Types specified in section 4 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions] are also used with the BGP-LS
Node MSD TLV as these code points are shared between IS-IS, OSPF and
BGP-LS protocols. The description and semantics of these new MSD-
types for BGP-LS are identical as specified in
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions].
Each MSD-type is encoded in the BGP-LS Node MSD TLV as a one-octet
type followed by a one-octet value as derived from the IS-IS or
OSPFv3 Node MSD advertisements as specified in [RFC8814].
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
4. SRv6 Link Attributes
SRv6 attributes and SIDs associated with a link or adjacency are
advertised using the BGP-LS Attribute TLVs defined in this section
and associated with the BGP-LS Link NLRI.
4.1. SRv6 End.X SID TLV
The SRv6 End.X SID TLV is used to advertise the SRv6 SIDs associated
with an IGP Adjacency SID behavior that correspond to a point-to-
point or point-to-multipoint link or adjacency of the node running
the IS-IS or OSPFv3 protocols. The information advertised via this
TLV is derived from the IS-IS SRv6 End.X SID sub-TLV (section 8.1 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions]) or the OSPFv3 SRv6 End.X SID
sub-TLV (section 9.1 of [I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]) in the
case of IS-IS or OSPFv3 respectively. This TLV can also be used to
advertise the SRv6 SID corresponding to the underlying layer-2 member
links for a layer-3 bundle interface as a sub-TLV of the L2 Bundle
Member Attribute TLV [RFC9085].
This TLV is also used by BGP-LS to advertise the BGP EPE Peer
Adjacency SID for SRv6 on the same lines as specified for SR-MPLS in
[RFC9086]. The SRv6 SID for the BGP Peer Adjacency using End.X
behaviors (viz. End.X, End.X with PSP, End.X with USP, and End.X
with PSP & USP) [RFC8986] indicates the cross-connect to a specific
layer-3 link to the specific BGP session peer (neighbor).
More than one instance of this TLV can be included in the BGP-LS
Attribute; one for each SRv6 End.X SID.
The TLV has the following format:
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Endpoint Behavior | Flags | Algorithm |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Weight | Reserved | SID (16 octets) ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (cont ...) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (cont ...) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (cont ...) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (cont ...) | Sub-TLVs (variable) . . .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: SRv6 End.X TLV Format
Where:
Type: 1106
Length: variable
Endpoint Behavior: 2 octet field. The Endpoint Behavior code
point for this SRv6 SID as defined in section 10.2 of [RFC8986].
Flags: 1 octet of flags. The flags are copied from the IS-IS SRv6
End.X SID sub-TLV (section 8.1 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions]) or the OSPFv3 SRv6 End.X SID
sub-TLV (section 9.1 of [I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]) in
the case of IS-IS or OSPFv3 respectively. In the case of BGP EPE
Peer Adjacency SID, the flags are as defined in Section 7.2.
Algorithm: 1 octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID.
Weight: 1 octet field. The value represents the weight of the SID
for the purpose of load balancing. The use of the weight is
defined in [RFC8402].
Reserved: 1 octet field that MUST be set to 0 when originated and
ignored on receipt.
SID: 16 octet field. This field encodes the advertised SRv6 SID
as 128 bit value.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
Sub-TLVs : Used to advertise sub-TLVs that provide additional
attributes for the specific SRv6 SID. This document defines one
in Section 8.
4.2. SRv6 LAN End.X SID TLV
For a LAN interface, an IGP node ordinarily announces only its
adjacency to the IS-IS pseudo-node (or the equivalent OSPF DR). The
information advertised via this TLV is derived from the IS-IS SRv6
LAN End.X SID sub-TLV (section 8.2 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions]) or the OSPFv3 SRv6 LAN End.X
sub-TLV (section 9.2 of [I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]) in the
case of IS-IS or OSPFv3 respectively. The SRv6 LAN End.X SID TLV
allows a node to announce the SRv6 SID corresponding to its
adjacencies to all other (i.e., non-DIS or non-DR) nodes attached to
the LAN in a single instance of the BGP-LS Link NLRI. Without this
TLV, multiple BGP-LS Link NLRIs would need to be originated, one for
each neighbor, to advertise the SRv6 End.X SID TLVs for those non-
DIS/non-DR neighbors. The SRv6 SID for these IGP adjacencies using
the End.X behaviors (viz. End.X, End.X with PSP, End.X with USP, and
End.X with PSP & USP) [RFC8986] are advertised using the SRv6 LAN
End.X SID TLV.
More than one instance of this TLV can be included in the BGP-LS
Attribute; one for each SRv6 LAN End.X SID.
The BGP-LS IS-IS SRv6 LAN End.X SID and BGP-LS OSPFv3 SRv6 LAN End.X
SID TLVs have the following format:
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Endpoint Behavior | Flags | Algorithm |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Weight | Reserved | Neighbor ID - |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| IS-IS System-ID (6 octets) or OSPFv3 Router-ID (4 octets) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (16 octets) ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (cont ...) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (cont ...) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (cont ...) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sub-TLVs (variable) . . .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 3: SRv6 LAN End.X SID TLV Format
Where:
* Type: 1107 in case of IS-IS and 1108 in case of OSPFv3
* Length: variable
* Endpoint Behavior: 2 octet field. The Endpoint Behavior code
point for this SRv6 SID as defined in section 10.2 of [RFC8986].
* Flags: 1 octet of flags. The flags are copied from the IS-IS SRv6
LAN End.X SID sub-TLV (section 8.2 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions]) or the OSPFv3 SRv6 LAN End.X
SID sub-TLV (section 9.2 of [I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions])
in the case of IS-IS or OSPFv3 respectively.
* Algorithm: 1 octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID.
* Weight: 1 octet field. The value represents the weight of the SID
for the purpose of load balancing.
* Reserved: 1 octet field that MUST be set to 0 when originated and
ignored on receipt.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
* Neighbor ID : 6 octets of Neighbor System-ID in IS-IS SRv6 LAN
End.X SID TLV or 4 octets of Neighbor Router-id in the OSPFv3 SRv6
LAN End.X SID TLV.
* SID: 16 octet field. This field encodes the advertised SRv6 SID
as 128 bit value.
* Sub-TLVs : Used to advertise sub-TLVs that provide additional
attributes for the specific SRv6 SID. This document defines one
in Section 8.
4.3. SRv6 Link MSD Types
The Link MSD TLV [RFC8814] of the BGP-LS Attribute of the Link NLRI
is also used to advertise the limits and the SRH operations supported
on the specific link by the SRv6 capable node. The SRv6 MSD Types
specified in section 4 of[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions] are also
used with the BGP-LS Link MSD TLV as these code points are shared
between IS-IS, OSPF, and BGP-LS protocols. The description and
semantics of these new MSD types for BGP-LS are identical as
specified in [I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions].
Each MSD-type is encoded in the BGP-LS Link MSD TLV as a one-octet
type followed by a one-octet value as derived from the IS-IS or
OSPFv3 Link MSD advertisements as specified in [RFC8814].
5. SRv6 Prefix Attributes
SRv6 attributes with an IPv6 prefix are advertised using the BGP-LS
Attribute TLVs defined in this section and associated with the BGP-LS
Prefix NLRI.
5.1. SRv6 Locator TLV
As specified in [RFC8986], an SRv6 SID comprises Locator, Function
and Argument parts.
A node is provisioned with one or more Locators supported by that
node. Locators are covering prefixes for the set of SIDs provisioned
on that node. Each Locator is advertised as a BGP-LS Prefix NLRI
object along with the SRv6 Locator TLV in its BGP-LS Attribute.
The information advertised via this TLV is derived from the IS-IS
SRv6 Locator TLV (section 7.1 of [I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions])
or the OSPFv3 SRv6 Locator TLV (section 7.1 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]) in the case of IS-IS or OSPFv3
respectively.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
The IPv6 Prefix matching the Locator may be also advertised as prefix
reachability by the underlying routing protocol. In this case, the
Prefix NLRI would be also associated with the Prefix Metric TLV
[RFC7752] that carries the routing metric for this prefix. A Prefix
NLRI, that has been advertised with a SRv6 Locator TLV, is also
considered a normal routing prefix (i.e., prefix reachability) only
when there is also an IGP metric TLV (TLV 1095) associated it.
Otherwise, it is considered only as an SRv6 Locator advertisement.
The SRv6 Locator TLV has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Flags | Algorithm | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Metric |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Sub-TLVs (variable) . . .
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 4: SRv6 Locator TLV Format
Where:
Type: 1162
Length: variable
Flags: 1 octet of flags. The flags are copied from the IS-IS SRv6
Locator TLV (section 7.1 of [I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions])
or the OSPFv3 SRv6 Locator TLV (section 7.1 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]) in the case of IS-IS or
OSPFv3 respectively.
Algorithm: 1 octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID.
Reserved: 2 octet field. The value MUST be set to 0 when
originated and ignored on receipt.
Metric: 4 octet field. The value of the metric for the Locator
copied from the IS-IS SRv6 Locator TLV (section 7.1 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions]) or the OSPFv3 SRv6 Locator
TLV (section 7.1 of [I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]) in the
case of IS-IS or OSPFv3 respectively.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
Sub-TLVs : Used to advertise sub-TLVs that provide additional
attributes for the given SRv6 Locator. Currently, none are
defined.
6. SRv6 SID NLRI
The "Link-State NLRI" defined in [RFC7752] is extended to carry the
SRv6 SID information.
A new "Link-State NLRI Type" is defined for SRv6 SID information as
follows:
* Link-State NLRI Type: SRv6 SID NLRI (value 6).
The SRv6 SIDs associated with the node are advertised using the BGP-
LS SRv6 SID NLRI.
The format of this new NLRI type is as shown in the following figure:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Protocol-ID |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Identifier |
| (8 octets) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Local Node Descriptors (variable) //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SRv6 SID Descriptors (variable) //
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 5: SRv6 SID NLRI Format
Where:
* Protocol-ID: 1-octet field that specifies the information source
protocol [RFC7752].
* Identifier: 8 octet value as defined in [RFC7752].
* Local Node Descriptors TLV: set of Node Descriptor TLVs for the
local node, as defined in [RFC7752] for IGPs, direct, and static
configuration or as defined in [RFC9086] for BGP protocol.
* SRv6 SID Descriptors: set of SRv6 SID Descriptor TLVs. This field
MUST contain a single SRv6 SID Information TLV (Section 6.1) and
MAY contain the Multi-Topology Identifier TLV [RFC7752].
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
New TLVs for advertisement within the BGP-LS Attribute [RFC7752] are
defined in Section 7 to carry the attributes of an SRv6 SID.
6.1. SRv6 SID Information TLV
An SRv6 SID that is associated with the node and advertised using the
SRv6 SID NLRI is encoded using the SRv6 SID Information TLV.
When advertising the SRv6 SIDs from the IGPs, the SID information is
derived from the IS-IS SRv6 End SID sub-TLV (section 7.2 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions]) or the OSPFv3 SRv6 End SID sub-
TLV (section 8 of [I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]) in the case
of IS-IS or OSPFv3 respectively.
The TLV carries the SRv6 SIDs corresponding to the BGP PeerNode and
PeerSet SID [RFC8402] when SRv6 BGP EPE functionality is enabled in
BGP.
The TLV has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (16 octets) ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (cont ...) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (cont ...) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| SID (cont ...) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 6: SRv6 SID Information TLV Format
Where:
Type: 518
Length: 16.
SID: 16 octet field. This field encodes the advertised SRv6 SID
as 128 bit value.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
7. SRv6 SID Attributes
This section specifies the TLVs to be carried in the BGP Link State
Attribute associated with the BGP-LS SRv6 SID NLRI.
7.1. SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV
Each SRv6 SID instantiated on an SRv6 capable node has specific
instructions (called behavior) bound to it. [RFC8986] describes how
behaviors are bound to a SID and also defines the initial set of
well-known behaviors.
The SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV is a mandatory TLV that MUST be
included in the BGP-LS Attribute associated with the BGP-LS SRv6 SID
NLRI.
When advertising the SRv6 SIDs from the IGPs, the Endpoint behavior,
Flags, and Algorithm are derived from the IS-IS SRv6 End SID sub-TLV
(section 7.2 of [I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions]) or the OSPFv3
SRv6 End SID sub-TLV (section 8 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]) in the case of IS-IS or OSPFv3
respectively.
When advertising the SRv6 SIDs corresponding to the BGP EPE
functionality, the Endpoint Behavior corresponds to End.X and similar
behaviors. When advertising the SRv6 SIDs that are locally
instantiated on the node using Direct as the Protoocl-ID, The
Endpoint Behavior corresponds to any SRv6 Endpoint Behavior
associated with the node. Flags are currently not defined. The
algorithm value MUST be 0 unless an algorithm is associated locally
with the SRv6 Locator from which the SID is allocated.
The TLV has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Endpoint Behavior | Flags | Algorithm |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 7: SRv6 Endpoint Behavior TLV
Where:
Type: 1250
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
Length: 4.
Endpoint Behavior: 2 octet field. The Endpoint Behavior code
point for this SRv6 SID. Support values are those from the "SRv6
Endpoint Behaviors" IANA registry (as established via section 10.2
of [RFC8986]).
Flags: 1 octet of flags. The flags map to the IS-IS or OSPFv3
encodings when advertising SRv6 SIDs corresponding to IGPs. For
SRv6 SIDs corresponding to BGP EPE and when advertising SRv6 SID
using Direct Protocol-ID, none are defined currently and they MUST
be set to 0 when originated and ignored on receipt.
Algorithm: 1 octet field. Algorithm associated with the SID.
7.2. SRv6 BGP Peer Node SID TLV
The BGP PeerNode SID and PeerSet SID for SR-MPLS are specified in
[RFC9086]. Similar Peer Node and Peer Set functionality can be
realized with SRv6 using SIDs with END.X behavior. Refer to
Appendix A for some differences between the signaling of these SIDs
in SR-MPLS and SRv6. The SRv6 BGP Peer Node SID TLV is a mandatory
TLV for use in the BGP-LS Attribute for an SRv6 SID NLRI advertised
by BGP for the EPE functionality. This TLV MUST be included along
with SRv6 SIDs that are associated with the BGP PeerNode or PeerSet
functionality.
The TLV has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Flags | Weight | Reserved |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Peer AS Number |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Peer BGP Identifier |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 8: SRv6 BGP Peer Node SID TLV Format
Where:
* Type: 1251
* Length: 12
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
* Flags: 1 octet of flags with the following definition:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|B|S|P| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 9: SRv6 BGP EPE SID Flags Format
- B-Flag: Backup Flag. If set, the SID is eligible to be
protected using fast reroute (FRR). The computation of the
backup forwarding path and its association with the forwarding
entry for the Peer BGP Identifier is implementation specific.
- S-Flag: Set Flag. When set, the S-Flag indicates that the SID
refers to a set of BGP peering sessions (i.e., BGP Peer Set SID
functionality) and therefore MAY be assigned to one or more
End.X SIDs associated with BGP peer sessions.
- P-Flag: Persistent Flag: When set, the P-Flag indicates that
the SID is persistently allocated, i.e., the value remains
consistent across router restart and/or session flap.
- Other bits are reserved for future use and MUST be set to 0
when originated and ignored on receipt.
The flags defined above are also used with the SRv6 End.X SID TLV
when advertising SRv6 BGP Peer Adjacency SID (Section 4.1).
* Weight: 1 octet field. The value represents the weight of the SID
for the purpose of load balancing. The use of the weight is
defined in [RFC8402].
* Reserved: 2 octet field. The value MUST be set to 0 when
originated and ignored on receipt.
* Peer AS Number : 4 octets of BGP AS number of the peer router.
* Peer BGP Identifier : 4 octets of the BGP Identifier (BGP Router-
ID) of the peer router.
For an SRv6 BGP EPE Peer Node SID, one instance of this TLV is
associated with the SRv6 SID. For SRv6 BGP EPE Peer Set SID,
multiple instances of this TLV (one for each peer in the “peer set”)
are associated with the SRv6 SID and the S-Flag is SET.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
8. SRv6 SID Structure TLV
The SRv6 SID Structure TLV is used to advertise the length of each
individual part of the SRv6 SID as defined in [RFC8986]. It is an
optional TLV for use in the BGP-LS Attribute for an SRv6 SID NLRI and
as a sub-TLV of the SRv6 End.X SID, IS-IS SRv6 LAN End.X SID, and
OSPFv3 SRv6 LAN End.X SID TLVs.
When advertising SRv6 SIDs from the IGPs, the SRv6 SID Structure
information is derived from the IS-IS SRv6 SID Structure sub-sub-TLV
(section 9 of [I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions]) or the OSPFv3 SRv6
SID Structure sub-TLV (section 10 of
[I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]) in the case of IS-IS or OSPFv3
respectively.
When advertising the SRv6 SIDs corresponding to the BGP EPE
functionality or for advertising SRv6 SIDs using Direct Protocol-ID,
the SRv6 SID Structure information is derived from the locally
provisioned SRv6 SID.
The TLV has the following format:
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| LB Length | LN Length | Fun. Length | Arg. Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 10: SRv6 SID Structure TLV
Where:
Type: 1252
Length: 4
LB Length: 1 octet field. SRv6 SID Locator Block length in bits.
LN Length: 1 octet field. SRv6 SID Locator Node length in bits.
Fun. Length: 1 octet field. SRv6 SID Function length in bits.
Arg. Length: 1 octet field. SRv6 SID Argument length in bits.
The sum of the LB Length, LN Length, Func. Length, and Arg. Length
MUST be less than or equal to 128.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
9. IANA Considerations
This document requests assigning code points from the IANA "Border
Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Parameters" registry group as
described in the subsections below.
9.1. BGP-LS NLRI-Types
The following code points have been assigned by IANA from the
registry called "BGP-LS NLRI-Types":
+------+----------------------------+---------------+
| Type | NLRI Type | Reference |
+------+----------------------------+---------------+
| 6 | SRv6 SID NLRI | this document |
+------+----------------------------+---------------+
Figure 11: SRv6 SID NLRI Type Code Point
9.2. BGP-LS TLVs
The following TLV code points have been assigned by IANA from the
registry called "BGP-LS Node Descriptor, Link Descriptor, Prefix
Descriptor, and Attribute TLVs":
+----------+----------------------------------------+---------------+
| TLV Code | Description | Value defined |
| Point | | in |
+----------+----------------------------------------+---------------+
| 518 | SRv6 SID Information | this document |
| 1038 | SRv6 Capabilities | this document |
| 1106 | SRv6 End.X SID | this document |
| 1107 | IS-IS SRv6 LAN End.X SID | this document |
| 1108 | OSPFv3 SRv6 LAN End.X SID | this document |
| 1162 | SRv6 Locator | this document |
| 1250 | SRv6 Endpoint Behavior | this document |
| 1251 | SRv6 BGP Peer Node SID | this document |
| 1252 | SRv6 SID Structure | this document |
+----------+----------------------------------------+---------------+
Figure 12: SRv6 BGP-LS Attribute TLV Code Points
9.3. SRv6 BGP EPE SID Flags
This document requests the creation of a new registry called "SRv6
BGP EPE SID Flags" under the "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State
(BGP-LS) Parameters" registry group. The allocation policy of this
registry is "Standards Action" according to [RFC8126].
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
The following flags are defined:
Bit Description Reference
---------------------------------------------------
0 Backup Flag (B-Flag) This document
1 Set Flag (S-Flag) This document
2 Persistent Flag (P-Flag) This document
3-7 Unassigned
Figure 13: SRv6 BGP EPE SID Flags
10. Manageability Considerations
This section is structured as recommended in [RFC5706].
The new protocol extensions introduced in this document augment the
existing IGP topology information that is distributed via [RFC7752].
Procedures and protocol extensions defined in this document do not
affect the BGP protocol operations and management other than as
discussed in the Manageability Considerations section of [RFC7752].
Specifically, the malformed attribute tests for syntactic checks in
the Fault Management section of [RFC7752] now encompass the new BGP-
LS extensions defined in this document. The semantic or content
checking for the TLVs specified in this document and their
association with the BGP-LS NLRI types or their BGP-LS Attribute is
left to the consumer of the BGP-LS information (e.g., an application
or a controller) and not the BGP protocol.
The SR information introduced in BGP-LS by this specification may be
used by BGP-LS consumer applications like an SR path computation
engine (PCE) to learn the SRv6 capabilities of the nodes in the
topology and the mapping of SRv6 segments to those nodes. This can
enable the SR PCE to perform path computations based on SR for
traffic engineering use-cases and to steer traffic on paths different
from the underlying IGP based distributed best path computation.
Errors in the encoding or decoding of the SRv6 information may result
in the unavailability of such information to the SR PCE or incorrect
information being made available to it. This may result in the SR
PCE not being able to perform the desired SR-based optimization
functionality or to perform it in an unexpected or inconsistent
manner. The handling of such errors by applications like SR PCE may
be implementation-specific and out of the scope of this document.
The manageability considerations related to BGP EPE functionality are
discussed in [RFC9086] in the context of SR-MPLS and they also apply
to this document in the context of SRv6.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
The extensions, specified in this document, do not introduce any new
configuration or monitoring aspects in BGP or BGP-LS other than as
discussed in [RFC7752]. The manageability aspects of the underlying
SRv6 features are covered by [I-D.ietf-spring-srv6-yang].
11. Security Considerations
The new protocol extensions introduced in this document augment the
existing IGP topology information that is distributed via [RFC7752].
The advertisement of the SRv6 link-state information defined in this
document presents a similar risk as associated with the existing set
of link-state information as described in [RFC7752]. The Security
Considerations section of [RFC7752] also applies to these extensions.
The procedures and new TLVs defined in this document, by themselves,
do not affect the BGP-LS security model discussed in [RFC7752].
The extensions introduced in this document are used to propagate IGP
defined information ([I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions] and
[I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]). These extensions represent
the advertisement of SRv6 information associated with the IGP node,
link, and prefix. The IGP instances originating these TLVs are
assumed to support all the required security and authentication
mechanisms (as described in [I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions] and
[I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]).
The security considerations related to BGP EPE functionality are
discussed in [RFC9086] in the context of SR-MPLS and they also apply
to this document in the context of SRv6.
BGP-LS SRv6 extensions enable traffic engineering use-cases within
the Segment Routing domain. SR operates within a trusted domain
[RFC8402] and its security considerations also apply to BGP-LS
sessions when carrying SR information. The SR traffic engineering
policies using the SIDs advertised via BGP-LS are expected to be used
entirely within this trusted SR domain (e.g., between multiple AS or
IGP domains within a single provider network). Therefore, precaution
is necessary to ensure that the link-state information (including
SRv6 information) advertised via BGP-LS sessions is securely limited
to consumers within this trusted SR domain. BGP peering sessions for
address-families other than Link-State may be set up to routers
outside the SR domain. The isolation of BGP-LS peering sessions is
RECOMMENDED to ensure that BGP-LS topology information (including the
newly added SR information) is not advertised to an external BGP
peering session outside the SR domain.
12. Contributors
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
James Uttaro
AT&T
USA
Email: ju1738@att.com
Hani Elmalky
Ericsson
USA
Email: hani.elmalky@gmail.com
Arjun Sreekantiah
Individual
USA
Email: arjunhrs@gmail.com
Les Ginsberg
Cisco Systems
USA
Email: ginsberg@cisco.com
Shunwan Zhuang
Huawei
China
Email: zhuangshunwan@huawei.com
13. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Peter Psenak, Arun Babu, Pablo
Camarillo, Francois Clad, Peng Shaofu, Cheng Li, Dhruv Dhody, Tom
Petch, and Dan Romascanu for their review of this document and their
comments. The authors would also like to thank Susan Hares for her
shepherd review and Adrian Farrel for his detailed Routing
Directorate review.
14. References
14.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions]
Psenak, P., Filsfils, C., Bashandy, A., Decraene, B., and
Z. Hu, "IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing over
IPv6 Dataplane", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-
ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-19, 14 November 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-
extensions-19.txt>.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
[I-D.ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions]
Li, Z., Hu, Z., Talaulikar, K., and P. Psenak, "OSPFv3
Extensions for SRv6", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft,
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-09, 14 January 2023,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-
ospfv3-srv6-extensions-09.txt>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC7752] Gredler, H., Ed., Medved, J., Previdi, S., Farrel, A., and
S. Ray, "North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and
Traffic Engineering (TE) Information Using BGP", RFC 7752,
DOI 10.17487/RFC7752, March 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7752>.
[RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8402] Filsfils, C., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Ginsberg, L.,
Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment
Routing Architecture", RFC 8402, DOI 10.17487/RFC8402,
July 2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8402>.
[RFC8814] Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Talaulikar, K., Mirsky, G.,
and N. Triantafillis, "Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD)
Using the Border Gateway Protocol - Link State", RFC 8814,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8814, August 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8814>.
[RFC8986] Filsfils, C., Ed., Camarillo, P., Ed., Leddy, J., Voyer,
D., Matsushima, S., and Z. Li, "Segment Routing over IPv6
(SRv6) Network Programming", RFC 8986,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8986, February 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8986>.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
[RFC9085] Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Ed., Filsfils, C., Gredler,
H., and M. Chen, "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State
(BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing", RFC 9085,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9085, August 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9085>.
[RFC9086] Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Ed., Filsfils, C., Patel, K.,
Ray, S., and J. Dong, "Border Gateway Protocol - Link
State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing BGP Egress
Peer Engineering", RFC 9086, DOI 10.17487/RFC9086, August
2021, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9086>.
14.2. Informative References
[I-D.ietf-spring-srv6-yang]
Raza, S., Agarwal, S., Liu, X., Hu, Z., Hussain, I., Shah,
H. C., Voyer, D., Matsushima, S., Horiba, K.,
Rajamanickam, J., and A. Abdelsalam, "YANG Data Model for
SRv6 Base and Static", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft,
draft-ietf-spring-srv6-yang-02, 23 September 2022,
<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-
yang-02.txt>.
[RFC5706] Harrington, D., "Guidelines for Considering Operations and
Management of New Protocols and Protocol Extensions",
RFC 5706, DOI 10.17487/RFC5706, November 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5706>.
[RFC8754] Filsfils, C., Ed., Dukes, D., Ed., Previdi, S., Leddy, J.,
Matsushima, S., and D. Voyer, "IPv6 Segment Routing Header
(SRH)", RFC 8754, DOI 10.17487/RFC8754, March 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8754>.
Appendix A. Differences with BGP-EPE for SR-MPLS
The signaling of SRv6 SIDs corresponding to BGP-EPE functionality as
defined in this document differ from the signaling of SR-MPLS BGP-EPE
SIDs as specified in [RFC9086]. This section provides a high-level
overview of the same.
There is no difference in the advertisement of the BGP Peer Adjacency
SID in both SR-MPLS and SRv6 and it is advertised as an attribute of
the Link NLRI which identifies a specific Layer 3 interface on the
BGP Speaker. The difference is in the advertisement of the BGP Peer
Node and Peer Set SIDs.
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
In case of SR-MPLS, an additional Link NLRI is required to be
advertised corresponding to each BGP Peering session on the node.
Note that, this is not the same Link NLRI associated with the actual
layer 3 interface even when the peering is set up using the interface
IP addresses. These BGP-LS Link NLRIs are not really links in the
conventional link-state routing data model but instead identify BGP
peering sessions. The BGP Peer Node and/or Peer Set SIDs associated
with that peering session are advertised as attributes associated
with this peering Link NLRI. In the case of SRv6, each BGP Peer Node
or Peer Set SID is considered to be associated with the BGP Speaker
node and is advertised using the BGP-LS SRv6 SID NLRI while the
peering session information is advertised as attributes associated
with it.
The advertisement of the BGP Peer Set SID for SR-MPLS is done by
including that SID as an attribute in all the Link NLRIs
corresponding to the peering sessions that are part of the "set".
The advertisement of the BGP Peer Set SID for SRv6 is advertised
using a single SRv6 SID NLRI and all the peers associated with that
"set" are indicated as attributes associated with the NLRI.
Authors' Addresses
Gaurav Dawra
LinkedIn
United States of America
Email: gdawra.ietf@gmail.com
Clarence Filsfils
Cisco Systems
Belgium
Email: cfilsfil@cisco.com
Ketan Talaulikar (editor)
Cisco Systems
India
Email: ketant.ietf@gmail.com
Mach Chen
Huawei
China
Email: mach.chen@huawei.com
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft BGP-LS Extensions for SRv6 February 2023
Daniel Bernier
Bell Canada
Canada
Email: daniel.bernier@bell.ca
Bruno Decraene
Orange
France
Email: bruno.decraene@orange.com
Dawra, et al. Expires 21 August 2023 [Page 26]