Internet Assigned Numbers Authority

Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry

Last Updated
2024-04-19
Expert(s)
TCP/UDP: Joe Touch; Eliot Lear, Kumiko Ono, Wes Eddy, Brian Trammell, 
Jana Iyengar, and Michael Scharf
SCTP: Michael Tuexen
DCCP: Eddie Kohler and Yoshifumi Nishida
Reference
[RFC6335]
Note
Service names and port numbers are used to distinguish between different
services that run over transport protocols such as TCP, UDP, DCCP, and
SCTP.

Service names are assigned on a first-come, first-served process, as
documented in [RFC6335].

Port numbers are assigned in various ways, based on three ranges: System
Ports (0-1023), User Ports (1024-49151), and the Dynamic and/or Private
Ports (49152-65535); the different uses of these ranges are described in
[RFC6335]. According to Section 8.1.2 of [RFC6335], System Ports are 
assigned by the "IETF Review" or "IESG Approval" procedures described in 
[RFC8126]. User Ports are assigned by IANA using the "IETF Review" process, 
the "IESG Approval" process, or the "Expert Review" process, as per 
[RFC6335]. Dynamic Ports are not assigned.

The registration procedures for service names and port numbers are
described in [RFC6335].

Assigned ports both System and User ports SHOULD NOT be used without
or prior to IANA registration.

************************************************************************
* PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:                                           *
*                                                                      *
* ASSIGNMENT OF A PORT NUMBER DOES NOT IN ANY WAY IMPLY AN             *
* ENDORSEMENT OF AN APPLICATION OR PRODUCT, AND THE FACT THAT NETWORK  *
* TRAFFIC IS FLOWING TO OR FROM A REGISTERED PORT DOES NOT MEAN THAT   *
* IT IS "GOOD" TRAFFIC, NOR THAT IT NECESSARILY CORRESPONDS TO THE     *
* ASSIGNED SERVICE. FIREWALL AND SYSTEM ADMINISTRATORS SHOULD          *
* CHOOSE HOW TO CONFIGURE THEIR SYSTEMS BASED ON THEIR KNOWLEDGE OF    *
* THE TRAFFIC IN QUESTION, NOT WHETHER THERE IS A PORT NUMBER          *
* REGISTERED OR NOT.                                                   *
************************************************************************

Request an Assignment
  [https://www.iana.org/protocols/apply]

Available Formats

CSV

XML

HTML

Plain text
Service Name Port Number Transport Protocol Description Assignee Contact Registration Date Modification Date Reference Service Code Unauthorized Use Reported Assignment Notes
wot tcp W3C WoT Thing Description or Directory [W3C_Web_of_Things_Working_Group] [Kazuyuki_Ashimura] 2022-11-22 2022-12-15

Defined TXT keys:

td: Absolute pathname of the Thing Description of the Thing or Thing Description of the Thing Description Directory.

type: Type of the Thing Description, i.e. "Thing" or "Directory". If omitted, the type is assumed to be Thing.

scheme: Scheme part of URL. One of the following values can be specified, with the standard registered URI interpretations [RFC7595]: http (HTTP over TCP),https (HTTP over TLS/TCP), coap+tcp (CoAP over TCP), or coaps+tcp (CoAP over TLS/TCP). If omitted, the scheme is assumed to be http.

wot udp W3C WoT Thing Description or Directory [W3C_Web_of_Things_Working_Group] [Kazuyuki_Ashimura] 2022-11-22 2022-12-15

Defined TXT keys:

td: Absolute pathname of the Thing Description of the Thing or Thing Description of the Thing Description Directory.

type: Type of the Thing Description, i.e. "Thing" or "Directory". If omitted, the type is assumed to be Thing.

scheme: Scheme part of URL. One of the following values can be specified, with the standard registered URI interpretations [RFC7595]: coap (CoAP over UDP), coaps CoAP over DTLS/UDP. If omitted, the scheme is assumed to be coap.

Contact Information

ID Name Organization Contact URI Last Updated
[Kazuyuki_Ashimura] Kazuyuki Ashimura mailto:ashimura&w3.org 2022-11-22
[W3C_Web_of_Things_Working_Group] W3C Web of Things Working Group mailto:team-wot&w3.org 2022-11-22